Not even a month ago, Bitcoin found a drastically sharp
crash following several questionable tweets concerning
Tesla’s plan to dump the cryptocurrency. The drop comes
as no surprise, however, as Elon Musk continues to be
Bitcoin’s biggest influence.
Musk has been one of Bitcoin’s earliest supporters, and
his famous tweets have only promoted the cryptocurrency
to thrive in past years. But, his recent Twitter
conversations have only encouraged a dip in Bitcoin’s
value as he hinted at their “breaking up” with a Linkin
Park meme and a broken heart emoji. After all they’ve
been through, is Musk’s relationship with Bitcoin coming
to an end?
To give you an idea of why Elon Musk has decided to take
a step back from Bitcoin, we’ll dive deep into
cryptocurrency mining and whether it has anything to do
with the Tesla CEO’s big decision.
As many users know, Bitcoin—the virtual
currency—operates on software that records all
transactions and data. The digital ledger is what is
called a “blockchain.”
Blockchain is the primary reason why Bitcoin works.
Blockchain is a type of
distributed ledger technology, which records individual transactions with
cryptographic signatures, or hashes. Each block is
individually encrypted. With millions of users
worldwide, and the consistent addition of blocks to the
chain, Bitcoin’s blockchain only gets more secure with
use. No one “owner” or overall controller of the
software means that nobody can steal or cheat the system
from behind the scenes.
When a Bitcoin
transaction
is made, a unique “key” is created and sent to a
network—or a computer farm. Here, people employ
supercomputers to help do the complex math and verify
the transaction. Once it’s verified, a new block is
created and added to the chain, providing its encrypted
record. This process is called “mining.” People can
assist in verifying transactions, and with each new
block that a miner adds to the chain, they’re
rewarded with bitcoins.
So, what does Bitcoin mining have to do with Musk’s
decision?
Back in March, Tesla’s CEO claimed that the company
would begin accepting Bitcoin
for purchases shortly. However, only a few months
later, Musk went back on his decision to accept BTC
payments and, instead, tweeted Tesla’s latest policy
in May, which explained that “Tesla has suspended
vehicle purchases using Bitcoin. We are concerned
about rapidly increasing use of fossil fuels for
Bitcoin mining and transactions.”
Minutes after Musk sent the tweet, Bitcoin’s value
dipped approximately
7 percent.
Nonetheless, Musk explains that Tesla still believes
in the potential of cryptocurrency within the economy;
however, they won’t accept any kind unless it can
report less than 1 percent of Bitcoin’s fossil fuel
emissions.
Many BTC supporters were outraged after Musk’s
claims—cryptocurrency versus carbon emissions has not
necessarily been a secret; so, why did he support
Bitcoin until now?
The reason behind Musk’s sudden swerve on Bitcoin isn’t
blatant. However,
plenty of ideas
have been tossed around regarding his seemingly
unexpected worry about carbon emissions. Some suspect
Musk merely didn’t understand the carbon footprint that
crypto mining has until now, while others claim that
can’t be true due to Bitcoin’s not-to-subtle impact on
the environment.
Other speculations allege that company regulations may
have impacted Tesla’s decision.
Tesla’s return policy for Bitcoin payments
worked out in their favor as customers would only get
back the equivalent dollar amount of the original
purchase when Bitcoin was valued higher. The policy may
have easily led to many
risks
with accounting, warranties, and other consumer
protection laws in the United States.
Despite plenty of backlash and criticism from various
crypto advocates, including Peter McCormack, who
claimed
that Musk’s decision concerning Bitcoin’s fossil fuel
emissions was “poorly informed,” information has
surfaced about cryptocurrency’s sustainability. After
all, it seems impossible for a digital currency to have
environmental implications. But, following a rocky
fallout with BTC, could Elon Musk be right?
Believe it or not, Bitcoin mining is
incredibly energy-extensive, with a power network that uses an excessive amount of
real-world energy. The network, with many hands mining
Bitcoin at all times, can handle at least 176
quintillion computations per second. Not to mention, the
Bitcoin network alone
utilizes more energy
than entire countries, including Sweden, Argentina,
Pakistan, and Malaysia, use within a year. As the value
of Bitcoin increases, energy efficiency becomes less of
a concern. Blocks will become more difficult to compute
as transactions become larger, ultimately using more and
more energy over time.
The primary concern with using excessive amounts of
energy is the
energy sources.
China is home to at least
65 percent
of Bitcoin miners, where they rely on coal as their main
energy source. Among other commonly-used fossil fuels,
coal is one of the largest contributors to carbon
emissions. Burning coal results in carbon dioxide
production, which, in turn, negatively impacts the
environment and encourages climate change. Bitcoin
mining claims
approximately 36 million
tons of carbon dioxide emissions every year.
Although Elon Musk has encouraged a considerable decrease in Bitcoin’s value since his public dump on Twitter, the tech billionaire has his reasons. As a major supporter of BTC, Musk did his best to take a step in a sustainable direction. Until it chooses more energy-efficient practices for mining cryptocurrency, who knows what’s in store for Bitcoin next?